Search This Blog

Tuesday, 10 August 2010

Trading Carbon Offsets for a Brighter Planet

Once governments realised the need to reduce carbon emissions they then had to face the fact that in many industries, organisations would simply be unable to reduce their emissions sufficiently without suffering a massive impact on their efficiency or profitability. The consequent impact on the economy would be unacceptable. A means was needed to create a transition from the current state of industry where carbon emissions were unregulated and unacceptably high to a future state where carbon emissions are controlled and within acceptable limits.

Various concepts and workarounds have come about because of the inability of industry to quickly reduce its carbon footprint to within acceptable limits. Recognising the potential impact on the economy of forcing businesses to conform to carbon footprint regulation, a trading vehicle was established in the form of carbon offsets to enable organisations to increase the amount of carbon dioxide or equivalent they are permitted to emit. Organisations that cannot meet the levels of carbon emissions deemed acceptable for their size can buy carbon offsets to make up the difference.

One carbon offset represents the reduction of one metric ton of carbon dioxide or its equivalent in other greenhouse gases. The money spent on carbon offsets is invested in renewable energy programmes. The challenge with such a marketplace is to make the cost to organisations buying carbon offsets enough to sustain a renewable energy programme that could make products and services available to enable those organisations to reduce their carbon footprint in the future. The carbon trading market is a transitional vehicle permitting organisations to contribute to a common fund to target greener and renewable energy, ultimately removing the need for the market at some point in the future.

There are two markets in which carbon offsets can be traded, the compliance market described above, and the voluntary market. The voluntary market enables anyone to offset their personal carbon footprint or the carbon footprint of others by making a donation. For example, many airlines permit customers to tick a box to donate an additional amount equivalent to the carbon footprint generated by their flight. Other organisations, like Brighter Planet, provide various tools to manage your footprint including a tool for calculating your personal footprint and credit cards that result in a contribution towards renewable energy projects with each purchase. Their website includes a long list of personal actions you can take to reduce your carbon footprint. The same organisation runs a scheme whereby if you raise awareness in this area, they will donate to the carbon offset fund on your behalf.

You can click on this badge to find out more and contribute in this way yourself: Brighter Planet's 350 Challenge

1 comment:

  1. Great blog Mark - nice to see you are keeping busy

    It is interesting that you discuss carbon trading and offset together. While I understand there is an offset scheme as part of the EU trading scheme (and presumably others), I thought one of the main points of trading schemes is to incentivise innovation in reducing carbon emissions (rather than offsetting them).

    The textbook example of this working was the sulfur dioxide trading scheme in North America, which very quickly virtually eliminated acid rain that was killing lakes (among other things). Industry said it would be too expensive to fix. Rather than taxing all industry equally (so they could all just pass the cost on to the consumer without actually changing their business), a trading scheme provided an economic incentive for those companies who could use innovation to cheaply retool.

    I haven't been following the development of the EU and American trading schemes particularly. I'd love to know if they are actually working.

    As for carbon offsets, I don't have a problem with offset projects per se, but I do worry that they salve our conscience rather than incentivise us to change. Friends of the Earth doesn't support offsetting for this reason.

    Brighter Planet looks great - I read their policy for accepting projects and it looks sound, and since their projects are in the UK, you'd expect much greater accountability in place to ensure they actually happen and all the money is used effectively. I'd certainly support them financially. But if I had to say where I'd rather focus my energy, it would be on reducing my emmissions, not offsetting them.

    hoping you will write more on this some time...

    Joel

    ReplyDelete